Imagine a Geo-Web Without Catalogs
Google Earth with KML search may not be an SDI, but it sure as hell looks like a data or service catalog killer. If every W*S published a KML document like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<kml xmlns="http://earth.google.com/kml/2.1">
<Document>
<Feature>
<LatLonAltBox>
<north>50.0</north>
<south>30.0</south>
<east>-100.0</east>
<west>-120.0</west>
</LatLonAltBox>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<h3>Example Web Map Service</h3>
<p>
This is a KML feature that points to the web map service
at example.com.
</p>
<p>
<a
href="http://example.com/wms/"
rel="alternate"
>
W*S Service Online Resource URL
</a>
</p>
<p>Keywords
<ul>
<li>physiography</li>
<li>hydrography</li>
</ul>
</p>
]]>
</description>
...
</Feature>
</Document>
</kml>
we would be able to discover services using Google Earth, or by searching the index of a yet-to-be-developed, open KML crawler.
Comments
Re: Imagine a Geo-Web Without Catalogs
Author: Allan
And then a great wailing and gnashing of teeth arose from the semweb crowd...Re: Imagine a Geo-Web Without Catalogs
Author: Sean
Wailing about the "alternate" link type? Then let's define a new one. It may look like I'm attaching new semantics to <ul> and <li>, but those are just for humans readers. The link (<a>) is the important part.Re: Imagine a Geo-Web Without Catalogs
Author: Allan
I don't know.. I like the human-readable stuff. I was thinking maybe some people would want to see more things like capabilities XML or 19119 metadata. But they can go ahead and do that. Overall, I think it's great that people can play around with using KML like this.